Long overdue in writing this topic, but with the approach of the descent of the film 'Batman and Superman' New in March next year we should go back to the back almost two years to go back to the
days of the work which they said that he Vaashl not worth seeing bad experience and he was Superman destroy once and for all ( Yes arrived to speak to this) and to the extent that some people do not like this film, but he has been compared to the film with the part that before a 'Back Superman' which I'm seeing it from the worst movies Allsopprhiro in history, frankly, the work is not worth seeing with respect to some of the views that they say this work is the film Superman funky, and they say he is a man of iron is a commercial part of the Superman without the appearance of the real Superman, he's the big void in the film marked the largest point negative is the choice of Zack Snyder to work on this project, although there is better than this director, but was chosen for several reasons, is a trading name plus it has a wide experience in the business, but is it the work was a failure in all respects or that it was an interesting and successful in all respects?
Let's go back to the back and put a little light on the first Superman character in general, it is a popular figure and famous in the history of cinema and some say that American hero, he has a supernatural power ..
But to shed the character of Superman in this film and the actor who played a role in the film, some were questioning the talent Henry Cavill and after the film was criticized this film and they said that he represented it in person before the increase and this gave the performance is bad, this is the word of others for Henry and his performance, but must to say that he made a personal Kevil Clark Kent badly and did not like, and I think it was totally his choice Vaashl Representative and frankly did not give a good performance even in the character of Superman ,,
When you see the difference between the performance of Michael Shannon, who played the role of 'general provided' Henry Kevil you will see that there is a big difference between their performance Shannon excellent actor and I think he chose this role had been successful, but Henry unfortunately his performance quite modest this may be a drawback most movies Allsopprhiro not choose an excellent representative of the role of the hero, and I think he made choices for the beauty of Representative no more, and this is what we saw in Kevil, and if I said that Superman was offline, I will say in the action scenes Yes exists, but as a figure not at all, Superman was present, but Clark Kent was absent.
I think it's Superman busy did not respond to
Sorry Amy, but the choice for this film was one of the largest your mistakes in your career, and also for the film in the main, because he chooses actress was born in the seventies to play the role of Lois Lane and a representative was born in the eighties the role of Clark Kent and including 9 years this is a mistake do, do in a big commercial movie like this, ,
But if we saw the selection of the role of Adams, Do It Adams brand name? Or in the role? I do not know what they think when Adams was chosen to play an important and significant role like Lois Lane, I'm Like Adams in several roles and I think it's an excellent actress, but unfortunately did not play an excellent role in the character of Lois Lane.
I have several names may be a good alternative name for Adams in character Lois Lane ,, Olivia Wilde, Rooney Mara, Emily Blunt, Zoe Dechinal, Jessica Chasstin, I am Kendrick, Bryce Dallas Howard.
Several good names to play the role of Lois Lane is better than Adams.
1. It's great to be Lois Lane
2. between them and Henry Kevil actor who played the role of Clark Kent 9 years!
3. I think it's not worthy of the actress herself she play the role of Lois Lane finally! (I love with this actress and her performances in the rest of her films)
Frankly, without points and the reasons ,, in general did not like Adams in the role of Lois Lane, she never imagined she never play this role, and I think it's one of the most negative aspects of the film is the presence of Adams and her appearance character Lois Lane because it did not play a role well ,,
The selection of the beautiful Diane Lane in the personality of Martha Kent where she played the role nicely ,, Kevin Costner is the other choice for the role was somewhat good and gave a good performance ,, Russell Crowe was good even though he did not show much character in the film 'The Gore' ,,
But something Michael Shannon I like about the character 'General provided' ,, when I heard that Shannon will play the role of Alsud in this film enthusiastic about more than that there will be a movie of Superman frankly and already watching this film is because of Michael Shannon, because he frankly representative enters personality nicely and always plays its roles very nicely and wonderful and chooses roles nicely.
I think it is the best performance in the film was the only one in the film is good
I think there are many reasons you might say that this film was Vaashl in many ways, and that even Superman on their own lovers they said that the film disappointing and it was not looking forward to our expectations, our expectations that we used to say when we saw Altrer, the film took the marketing fabulous frankly did not see him a film taking This distinctive marketing, through presentations and special promotional posters and so on, but in the last disappoint most people who saw him
The work is not worth viewing ,,
I would not say very bad and unbearable, I will say that he failed work of art and in terms of cinematic experience so, I am the presence of this film at the cinema will not say that the movie was fun when a witness is somewhat interesting ,, but unfortunately not a wonderful thing to see a fight influences visual! Yes influences, and buildings explode like crazy in a way, I think it's Zack plead too influences, such plead too Yes ,,
'' Is this a joke ?? j Zack ''
Yes, this is the most important scenes in the film, and, see to the output is very bad, and the fight that never believe what between Gen. provided and Superman, this is supposed to be not of the best scenes in the film, became one of the worst scenes in the film ,, not only this scene, This scene was long and it was very bad ,, Superman gives a powerful punch provided and then provided the fly and enter the premises and buildings explode ?? You should tell us it's just me Zack joke ,,!
Frankly I wrote this topic to remember what we saw this film ,, kinetic scenes are worthless, just flying effects!
In addition, this should be the scene super gorgeous and it's in the cinema people enjoy it, but not something I see in this fight just flying through the air and the effects of explosions ,, unfortunately reminds me of Michael Bay taking out a bit!
What a good movie? Habaytha of the things in the film when he was a young Clark Kent and beaten by kids like him and he does not use his power hacks to defend himself, and the scene of the bus ,, only!
Fight scene at the end, or even Superman scene when he quarreled with friends ,, provided the worst of what is this scene in terms of excretion ,, and the use of excessive visual stimuli! '' Sorry Superman ''
Congratulations Snyder gave us a bad image for the Superman movie Superman ,, Sorry disappointing ,, and Vaashl perfectly!
If you want to work on the second part I wish that there be a new director for the project ,, Snyder Superman marred reputation ,, you have a large project 'Superman, Batman' if it fails it will not have a future and will lose your friendship with DC permanently company ..
We wait and we will see in March .
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق